Image from Google Jackets

Modelling dynamic properties of filled rubber

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublication details: Plastics, Rubber and Composites Processing and Applications 1997Description: 451-461Online resources: Summary: The non-linear stress-strain characteristics of filled rubber, and attempts at producing a non-linear model, have been reviewed. However, equivalent linear characterisation, yielding amplitude dependent values of shear modulus and loss tanget, is commonly used. Alternative methods of calculating the equivalent linear parameters: secant, harmonic, or skeleton methods, give different answers, as demonstrated for a particular rubber. The responses predicted from numerical integration of the equation of motion of an isolated mass using a proposed non-linear model are compared with those for equivalent linearisations of the non-linear model. The objective was to quantify the sensitivity of prediction of isolator performance to the choice of non-linear or linear modelling, and, in the latter case, linearisation method. For steady state responses to sinusoidal excitation, the equivalent linear model was found to be satisfactory, with harmonic linearisation as the preferred method. Differences are greater for transient responses, but, provided linearised parameters are chosen at appropriate strain levels, the differences are usually less than 20;.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Vol info Status
Journals Journals RRII Library Rubber chemistry Volume 26, Issue 10 Journals
Total holds: 0

Source Year: 1998

The non-linear stress-strain characteristics of filled rubber, and attempts at producing a non-linear model, have been reviewed. However, equivalent linear characterisation, yielding amplitude dependent values of shear modulus and loss tanget, is commonly used. Alternative methods of calculating the equivalent linear parameters: secant, harmonic, or skeleton methods, give different answers, as demonstrated for a particular rubber. The responses predicted from numerical integration of the equation of motion of an isolated mass using a proposed non-linear model are compared with those for equivalent linearisations of the non-linear model. The objective was to quantify the sensitivity of prediction of isolator performance to the choice of non-linear or linear modelling, and, in the latter case, linearisation method. For steady state responses to sinusoidal excitation, the equivalent linear model was found to be satisfactory, with harmonic linearisation as the preferred method. Differences are greater for transient responses, but, provided linearised parameters are chosen at appropriate strain levels, the differences are usually less than 20;.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share