A randomization method for efficiently and accurately processing fine roots, separating them from debris, in the laboratory
Material type:
TextPublication details: Plant and Soil 2013Description: 383-398Subject(s): Summary: Background and Aims We developed a method for processing roots from soil cores and monoliths in the laboratory to reduce the time and cost devoted to separating roots from debris and improve the accuracy of root variable estimates. The method was tested on soil cores from a California oak savanna, with roots from trees, Quercus douglasii, and annual grasses. Methods In the randomized sampling method, one isolates the sample function consisting of roots and organic debris<=1 cm in length, and randomizes it through immersion in water and vigorous mixing. Sub-samples from the mixure are then used to estimate the percentage of roots in this fraction, thereby enabling an estimate of total sample biomass. Results We found that root biomass estimates, determined through the randomization method, differed from total root biomass established by meticulously picking every root from a sample with an error of 3.0;+/-0.6;s.e. Conclusions This method greatly reduces the time and resources for root processing from soil cores and monoliths, and improves the accuracy of root variable estimates compared to standard methods. This gives researchers the ability to increase sample frequency and reduce the error associated with studying roots at the landscape and plant scales.
| Item type | Current library | Vol info | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Journals
|
RRII Library Agronomy | Volume 363, Issue 02-Jan | Journals |
Background and Aims We developed a method for processing roots from soil cores and monoliths in the laboratory to reduce the time and cost devoted to separating roots from debris and improve the accuracy of root variable estimates. The method was tested on soil cores from a California oak savanna, with roots from trees, Quercus douglasii, and annual grasses. Methods In the randomized sampling method, one isolates the sample function consisting of roots and organic debris<=1 cm in length, and randomizes it through immersion in water and vigorous mixing. Sub-samples from the mixure are then used to estimate the percentage of roots in this fraction, thereby enabling an estimate of total sample biomass. Results We found that root biomass estimates, determined through the randomization method, differed from total root biomass established by meticulously picking every root from a sample with an error of 3.0;+/-0.6;s.e. Conclusions This method greatly reduces the time and resources for root processing from soil cores and monoliths, and improves the accuracy of root variable estimates compared to standard methods. This gives researchers the ability to increase sample frequency and reduce the error associated with studying roots at the landscape and plant scales.
There are no comments on this title.