Impact of root water content on root biomass estimation using ground penetrating radar: Evidence from forward stimulations and field contrlled experiments (Record no. 60764)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 03014nam a2200193Ia 4500 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--AUTHOR NAME | |
| Personal name | Guo Li et al. |
| 245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Impact of root water content on root biomass estimation using ground penetrating radar: Evidence from forward stimulations and field contrlled experiments |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Name of publisher | Plant and Soil |
| Year of publication | 2013 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Number of Pages | 503-520 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Background and Aims: The GPR indices used for predicting root biomass are measures of root radar reflectance is highly coorelated with root water content. The objectives of this study are to assess the impact of root water content on GPR-based root biomass estimation and to develop more reliable approches to quantify root biomass using GPR.Methods: Four hundred nine roots of five plant species in a sandy area of northern China were examined to determine the general water content rah]nge of roots in sandy soils. Two sets of Gpr simulation scenarios(including 492 synthesized radargrams in total) were then conducted to compare the changes of root radar signal and the accuracies of root biomass estimation by GPR at different root gravimetric water content levels, In the field, GPR transects were scanned for Ulmus pumila roots buried in sandy soils with three antenna center frequencies (0.5, 0.9, and 2.0 GHz). The performance of new GPR-based root biomass quantification approaches(one using time interval GPR index and the other using a non-linear regression model) was then tested. Results: All studied roots exhibited a broad range of gravimetric water content(>125;), with the water contents of most roots ranging from 90 5 to 150;. Both field experiments and forward simulations indicated that 1) waveforms of root radar reflection, radar-reflectance related GPR indices, and root biomass estimation accuracy were all affected by root water content; and 20 using time interval index and establishing a nonlinear regression model of root biomass GPR indices improved the accuracy of root biomass estimation, decreasing the prediction error (RMSE) by 4 to 30;under field conditions. Conclusions: The magnitude of GPR indices depends on both root biomass and root water content, and root water content affects root biomass estimation using GPR indices. Using a linear regression model of root biomass on radar-reflectance related GPR index for root biomass estimation would only be feasible for roots with a relative narrow range of water content(e.g., when gravimetric water contents of studied roots vary within 20;). Appropriate GPR index and regression models should be selected based on the water content range of roots. The new protocol of root biomass quantification by GPR presented in this study improves the accuracy of root biomass estimation. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical Term | Controlled field experiment |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical Term | Forward simulation |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical Term | Ground penetrating radar |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical Term | Noninvasive root investigation |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical Term | Root biomass estimation |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical Term | Root water content |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Journals |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Serial Enumeration / chronology | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journals | RRII Library | RRII Library | 03/04/2014 | Volume 371, Issue 02-Jan | Journals |